Malaysian vs Osage Family Poverty
COMPARE
Malaysian
Osage
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Malaysians
Osage
9.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
10.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
211th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
8.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
213th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Malaysian vs Osage Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,820,705 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Malaysians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.116 and weighted average of 9.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,772,722 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.233 and weighted average of 9.7%, a difference of 0.94%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Malaysian | Osage |
| Minimum | 0.81% | 0.88% |
| Maximum | 26.5% | 24.4% |
| Range | 25.6% | 23.6% |
| Mean | 10.6% | 10.3% |
| Median | 9.6% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.7% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.3% | 12.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Malaysians and Osage by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Malaysians are Alsatian (9.6%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Thailand (9.7%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Uruguay (9.5%, a difference of 0.97%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (9.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and Sierra Leonean (9.5%, a difference of 1.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Immigrants from Micronesia (9.8%, a difference of 0.58%), Nonimmigrants (9.8%, a difference of 0.61%), Immigrants from Thailand (9.7%, a difference of 0.63%), Moroccan (9.8%, a difference of 0.67%), and American (9.8%, a difference of 0.87%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 19.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 9.4% |
| German Russians | 19.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 18.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 9.4% |
| Aleuts | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 9.5% |
| Immigrants | South America | 18.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 9.5% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 15.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 15.1 /100 | #208 | Poor 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 9.5% |
| Alsatians | 11.3 /100 | #210 | Poor 9.6% |
| Malaysians | 10.6 /100 | #211 | Poor 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 9.7 /100 | #212 | Tragic 9.7% |
| Osage | 8.0 /100 | #213 | Tragic 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 6.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 6.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Moroccans | 6.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Americans | 6.2 /100 | #217 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Panamanians | 5.6 /100 | #218 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 5.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Bermudans | 5.3 /100 | #220 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 4.8 /100 | #221 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Japanese | 4.8 /100 | #222 | Tragic 9.9% |