Japanese vs Immigrants from Micronesia Family Poverty
COMPARE
Japanese
Immigrants from Micronesia
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Japanese
Immigrants from Micronesia
9.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
4.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
222nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
6.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
214th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Japanese vs Immigrants from Micronesia Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 248,852,848 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.648 and weighted average of 9.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,589,197 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.182 and weighted average of 9.8%, a difference of 1.1%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Japanese | Immigrants from Micronesia |
| Minimum | 0.66% | 4.2% |
| Maximum | 45.9% | 26.3% |
| Range | 45.3% | 22.1% |
| Mean | 14.7% | 11.0% |
| Median | 11.0% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.3% | 7.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.8% | 12.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 4.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.5% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.4% | 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Japanese and Immigrants from Micronesia by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Immigrants from Cambodia (9.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Africa (9.9%, a difference of 0.30%), Bermudan (9.9%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Eritrea (9.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and Panamanian (9.8%, a difference of 0.49%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Micronesia are Nonimmigrants (9.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Moroccan (9.8%, a difference of 0.090%), American (9.8%, a difference of 0.29%), Osage (9.7%, a difference of 0.58%), and Panamanian (9.8%, a difference of 0.61%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 15.1 /100 | #208 | Poor 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 9.5% |
| Alsatians | 11.3 /100 | #210 | Poor 9.6% |
| Malaysians | 10.6 /100 | #211 | Poor 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 9.7 /100 | #212 | Tragic 9.7% |
| Osage | 8.0 /100 | #213 | Tragic 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 6.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 6.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Moroccans | 6.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Americans | 6.2 /100 | #217 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Panamanians | 5.6 /100 | #218 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 5.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Bermudans | 5.3 /100 | #220 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 4.8 /100 | #221 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Japanese | 4.8 /100 | #222 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 4.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Marshallese | 3.9 /100 | #224 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 3.6 /100 | #225 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Ottawa | 3.3 /100 | #226 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 3.3 /100 | #227 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Sudanese | 3.1 /100 | #228 | Tragic 10.0% |