Luxembourger vs Norwegian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Luxembourger
Norwegian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Luxembourgers
Norwegians
20.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
84.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
63.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
166th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Luxembourger vs Norwegian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 143,364,483 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.206 and weighted average of 20.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 516,441,916 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.317 and weighted average of 20.8%, a difference of 1.9%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Luxembourger | Norwegian |
| Minimum | 10.2% | 3.6% |
| Maximum | 52.1% | 50.0% |
| Range | 41.9% | 46.4% |
| Mean | 21.8% | 24.8% |
| Median | 20.7% | 23.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.3% | 19.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.0% | 29.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.7% | 10.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.6% | 8.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.5% | 8.7% |
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers and Norwegians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are South African (20.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Portuguese (20.5%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Denmark (20.5%, a difference of 0.49%), Puget Sound Salish (20.6%, a difference of 0.58%), and Immigrants from Uruguay (20.6%, a difference of 0.77%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Immigrants from Norway (20.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Ugandan (20.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Iraqi (20.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Lebanese (20.8%, a difference of 0.32%), and Northern European (20.8%, a difference of 0.37%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
| Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
| Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
| South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
| Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
| Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
| Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
| Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
| Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
| Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
| Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |