Luxembourger vs Lithuanian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Luxembourger
Lithuanian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Luxembourgers
Lithuanians
14.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
53rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
37th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Luxembourger vs Lithuanian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 142,903,603 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.078 and weighted average of 14.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 410,552,780 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.250 and weighted average of 13.9%, a difference of 3.0%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Luxembourger | Lithuanian |
Minimum | 1.4% | 0.39% |
Maximum | 33.3% | 78.0% |
Range | 32.0% | 77.7% |
Mean | 11.9% | 19.1% |
Median | 11.6% | 12.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.9% | 9.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.2% | 21.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.3% | 11.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 17.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 17.6% |
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers and Lithuanians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Italian (14.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Pakistan (14.2%, a difference of 0.21%), Estonian (14.3%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Romania (14.3%, a difference of 0.47%), and Immigrants from Israel (14.2%, a difference of 0.76%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Russian (13.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (13.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Moldova (13.9%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Australia (14.0%, a difference of 0.95%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (14.0%, a difference of 1.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Russians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.6 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.5 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.5 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.4 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Koreans | 99.4 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.4 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Croatians | 99.3 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.3 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Israel | 99.2 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.1 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Italians | 99.1 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Luxembourgers | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Estonians | 98.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 14.3% |