Luxembourger vs Cambodian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Luxembourger
Cambodian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Luxembourgers
Cambodians
14.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
53rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
98.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
61st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Luxembourger vs Cambodian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 142,903,603 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.078 and weighted average of 14.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,087,576 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Cambodians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.257 and weighted average of 14.4%, a difference of 0.93%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Luxembourger | Cambodian |
Minimum | 1.4% | 5.5% |
Maximum | 33.3% | 28.9% |
Range | 32.0% | 23.4% |
Mean | 11.9% | 13.9% |
Median | 11.6% | 12.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.9% | 9.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.2% | 18.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.3% | 8.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers and Cambodians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Italian (14.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Pakistan (14.2%, a difference of 0.21%), Estonian (14.3%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from Romania (14.3%, a difference of 0.47%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (14.4%, a difference of 0.54%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cambodians are Polish (14.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Scandinavian (14.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Europe (14.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Zimbabwean (14.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Bulgaria (14.4%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.3 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Israel | 99.2 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.1 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Italians | 99.1 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Luxembourgers | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Estonians | 98.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 98.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Zimbabweans | 98.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Poles | 98.7 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Cambodians | 98.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Scandinavians | 98.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Europe | 98.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.6 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 14.4% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 98.6 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 98.5 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 14.5% |
Laotians | 98.4 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 14.5% |