Lebanese vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Receiving Food Stamps

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 400,242,297 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Lebanese and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.516 and weighted average of 11.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 510,553,745 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.046 and weighted average of 11.1%, a difference of 0.43%.

Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary

Measurement	Lebanese	Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
Minimum	4.7%	2.7%
Maximum	33.2%	22.4%
Range	28.5%	19.7%
Mean	13.3%	11.3%
Median	9.5%	11.1%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	8.2%	9.3%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	19.2%	12.7%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	11.0%	3.4%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	6.8%	3.2%
Standard Deviation (Population)	6.7%	3.1%

Demographics Similar to Lebanese and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia by Receiving Food Stamps

In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Lebanese are Immigrants from Spain (11.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (11.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Armenian (11.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Argentina (11.2%, a difference of 0.31%), and Soviet Union (11.1%, a difference of 0.38%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Eastern Asia are Brazilian (11.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Soviet Union (11.1%, a difference of 0.040%), White/Caucasian (11.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Taiwanese (11.0%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Spain (11.1%, a difference of 0.40%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Receiving Food Stamps
Celtics	87.8 /100 \| #140	Excellent 10.9%
Immigrants \| Vietnam	86.7 /100 \| #141	Excellent 11.0%
Chileans	86.2 /100 \| #142	Excellent 11.0%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	86.0 /100 \| #143	Excellent 11.0%
Syrians	85.5 /100 \| #144	Excellent 11.0%
Hungarians	85.1 /100 \| #145	Excellent 11.0%
Taiwanese	84.2 /100 \| #146	Excellent 11.0%
Whites/Caucasians	83.9 /100 \| #147	Excellent 11.1%
Immigrants \| South Eastern Asia	83.3 /100 \| #148	Excellent 11.1%
Brazilians	83.2 /100 \| #149	Excellent 11.1%
Soviet Union	83.1 /100 \| #150	Excellent 11.1%
Immigrants \| Spain	81.7 /100 \| #151	Excellent 11.1%
Immigrants \| Kazakhstan	81.7 /100 \| #152	Excellent 11.1%
Lebanese	81.6 /100 \| #153	Excellent 11.1%
Armenians	81.4 /100 \| #154	Excellent 11.1%
Immigrants \| Argentina	80.4 /100 \| #155	Excellent 11.2%
Immigrants \| Afghanistan	75.6 /100 \| #156	Good 11.3%
Immigrants \| Lebanon	75.2 /100 \| #157	Good 11.3%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	72.6 /100 \| #158	Good 11.3%
Immigrants \| Oceania	70.4 /100 \| #159	Good 11.4%
French Canadians	69.5 /100 \| #160	Good 11.4%