Iranian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Poverty
COMPARE
Iranian
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Iranians
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
10.7%
POVERTY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
32nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
POVERTY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iranian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,670,706 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Iranians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.062 and weighted average of 10.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,452,968 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.131 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 2.1%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Iranian | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
Minimum | 2.6% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 27.1% | 30.2% |
Range | 24.5% | 28.3% |
Mean | 8.8% | 10.4% |
Median | 8.4% | 9.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.3% | 7.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.6% | 12.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 5.6% |
Demographics Similar to Iranians and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Iranians are Polish (10.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Danish (10.7%, a difference of 0.17%), Greek (10.7%, a difference of 0.18%), Macedonian (10.8%, a difference of 0.54%), and Immigrants from Poland (10.8%, a difference of 0.63%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Immigrants from Romania (11.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Slovene (11.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Japan (11.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Turkish (11.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Moldova (10.9%, a difference of 0.59%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Danes | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Iranians | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Macedonians | 99.4 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Poland | 99.4 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Tongans | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Cypriots | 99.3 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Russians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.1 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Turks | 98.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Japan | 98.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 11.0% |