Tongan vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Poverty
COMPARE
Tongan
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Tongans
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
10.8%
POVERTY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
35th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
POVERTY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tongan vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,864,002 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Tongans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.088 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,452,968 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.131 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 1.5%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Tongan | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
Minimum | 5.8% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 19.8% | 30.2% |
Range | 14.1% | 28.3% |
Mean | 10.4% | 10.4% |
Median | 10.1% | 9.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.8% | 7.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.0% | 12.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.1% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 5.6% |
Demographics Similar to Tongans and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tongans are Immigrants from Poland (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Cypriot (10.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Macedonian (10.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Greece (10.8%, a difference of 0.17%), and Czech (10.8%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Immigrants from Romania (11.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Slovene (11.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Japan (11.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Turkish (11.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Asian (11.0%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Danes | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Iranians | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Macedonians | 99.4 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Poland | 99.4 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Tongans | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Cypriots | 99.3 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Russians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.1 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Turks | 98.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Japan | 98.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Asians | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 11.0% |