Iranian vs Immigrants from Japan Poverty
COMPARE
Iranian
 Immigrants from Japan
 Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Iranians
Immigrants from Japan
10.7%
POVERTY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
32nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
POVERTY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iranian vs Immigrants from Japan Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,670,706 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Iranians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.062 and weighted average of 10.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 340,013,080 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.808 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 2.2%.
 
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Iranian | Immigrants from Japan | 
| Minimum | 2.6% | 2.0% | 
| Maximum | 27.1% | 100.0% | 
| Range | 24.5% | 98.0% | 
| Mean | 8.8% | 19.4% | 
| Median | 8.4% | 9.4% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.3% | 6.6% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.6% | 19.2% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 12.6% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 22.6% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 22.4% | 
Demographics Similar to Iranians and Immigrants from Japan by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Iranians are Polish (10.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Danish (10.7%, a difference of 0.17%), Macedonian (10.8%, a difference of 0.54%), Immigrants from Poland (10.8%, a difference of 0.63%), and Tongan (10.8%, a difference of 0.68%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Japan are Slovene (11.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Asian (11.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Romania (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Turkish (11.0%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty | 
| Danes | 99.5 /100 | #30  | Exceptional 10.7%  | 
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31  | Exceptional 10.7%  | 
| Iranians | 99.5 /100 | #32  | Exceptional 10.7%  | 
| Macedonians | 99.4 /100 | #33  | Exceptional 10.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.4 /100 | #34  | Exceptional 10.8%  | 
| Tongans | 99.4 /100 | #35  | Exceptional 10.8%  | 
| Cypriots | 99.3 /100 | #36  | Exceptional 10.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37  | Exceptional 10.8%  | 
| Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #38  | Exceptional 10.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.3 /100 | #39  | Exceptional 10.8%  | 
| Russians | 99.3 /100 | #40  | Exceptional 10.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.2 /100 | #41  | Exceptional 10.9%  | 
| Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #42  | Exceptional 10.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.2 /100 | #43  | Exceptional 10.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.1 /100 | #44  | Exceptional 10.9%  | 
| Turks | 98.9 /100 | #45  | Exceptional 11.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.9 /100 | #46  | Exceptional 11.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Romania | 98.9 /100 | #47  | Exceptional 11.0%  | 
| Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #48  | Exceptional 11.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Japan | 98.9 /100 | #49  | Exceptional 11.0%  | 
| Asians | 98.9 /100 | #50  | Exceptional 11.0%  |