Norwegian vs Immigrants from Central America Female Poverty
COMPARE
Norwegian
Immigrants from Central America
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Norwegians
Immigrants from Central America
11.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
19th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
304th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Norwegian vs Immigrants from Central America Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 532,481,223 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.299 and weighted average of 11.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 535,791,715 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Central America and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.710 and weighted average of 16.8%, a difference of 46.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Norwegian | Immigrants from Central America |
| Minimum | 0.92% | 6.7% |
| Maximum | 55.6% | 100.0% |
| Range | 54.6% | 93.3% |
| Mean | 12.7% | 26.7% |
| Median | 11.1% | 20.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.0% | 16.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.9% | 27.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 11.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.4% | 18.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.4% | 18.4% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Norwegians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Immigrants from Scotland (11.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Bolivian (11.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Bolivia (11.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Eastern European (11.5%, a difference of 0.23%), and Latvian (11.4%, a difference of 0.64%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Central America by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Central America are Immigrants from Grenada (16.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Choctaw (16.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Caribbean (16.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Seminole (16.9%, a difference of 0.40%), and African (16.9%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |