Immigrants vs Immigrants from South America Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants
✖
Immigrants from South America
✖
Family Poverty
✖
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants
Immigrants from South America
10.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
3.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
225th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
18.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
206th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants vs Immigrants from South America Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 572,663,107 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.271 and weighted average of 10.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,267,691 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South America and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.057 and weighted average of 9.5%, a difference of 5.5%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants | Immigrants from South America |
| Minimum | 5.5% | 3.3% |
| Maximum | 61.7% | 18.4% |
| Range | 56.2% | 15.1% |
| Mean | 10.8% | 9.5% |
| Median | 10.2% | 9.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.9% | 8.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.9% | 10.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.0% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 2.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 2.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants and Immigrants from South America by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants are Marshallese (9.9%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Africa (9.9%, a difference of 0.55%), Japanese (9.9%, a difference of 0.85%), Immigrants from Cambodia (9.9%, a difference of 0.88%), and Bermudan (9.9%, a difference of 1.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South America are Aleut (9.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Sierra Leonean (9.5%, a difference of 0.53%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (9.5%, a difference of 0.64%), Immigrants from Uruguay (9.5%, a difference of 0.93%), and Alsatian (9.6%, a difference of 1.7%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Aleuts | 18.0 /100 | #205 | Poor 9.5% |
| Immigrants | South America | 18.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 9.5% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 15.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 15.1 /100 | #208 | Poor 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #209 | Poor 9.5% |
| Alsatians | 11.3 /100 | #210 | Poor 9.6% |
| Malaysians | 10.6 /100 | #211 | Poor 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 9.7 /100 | #212 | Tragic 9.7% |
| Osage | 8.0 /100 | #213 | Tragic 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 6.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 6.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Moroccans | 6.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Americans | 6.2 /100 | #217 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Panamanians | 5.6 /100 | #218 | Tragic 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 5.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Bermudans | 5.3 /100 | #220 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 4.8 /100 | #221 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Japanese | 4.8 /100 | #222 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 4.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Marshallese | 3.9 /100 | #224 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 3.6 /100 | #225 | Tragic 10.0% |