Immigrants from Lithuania vs Native/Alaskan Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Lithuania
Native/Alaskan
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Lithuania
Natives/Alaskans
9.4%
MALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
13th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.9%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
333rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Lithuania vs Native/Alaskan Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,705,146 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.375 and weighted average of 9.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 512,413,000 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.664 and weighted average of 16.9%, a difference of 80.0%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Lithuania | Native/Alaskan |
| Minimum | 1.8% | 6.2% |
| Maximum | 17.6% | 53.5% |
| Range | 15.8% | 47.3% |
| Mean | 7.0% | 24.0% |
| Median | 7.0% | 21.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.9% | 16.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.7% | 30.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 14.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 9.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 9.9% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Lithuania by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Immigrants from Bolivia (9.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Bolivian (9.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (9.4%, a difference of 0.38%), Bhutanese (9.5%, a difference of 0.67%), and Bulgarian (9.3%, a difference of 0.82%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Demographics Similar to Natives/Alaskans by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Natives/Alaskans are Houma (16.7%, a difference of 1.2%), Cheyenne (17.6%, a difference of 4.2%), Ute (16.2%, a difference of 4.2%), Apache (17.7%, a difference of 4.4%), and Immigrants from Dominican Republic (16.2%, a difference of 4.6%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 18.7% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 19.5% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 20.1% |