Immigrants from Turkey vs Laotian Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Turkey
Laotian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Turkey
Laotians
11.6%
POVERTY
91.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
109th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.6%
POVERTY
92.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
102nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Turkey vs Laotian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,977,543 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Turkey and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.602 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,750,373 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.061 and weighted average of 11.6%, a difference of 0.27%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Turkey | Laotian |
| Minimum | 4.2% | 0.072% |
| Maximum | 68.6% | 28.0% |
| Range | 64.4% | 27.9% |
| Mean | 12.6% | 10.3% |
| Median | 8.9% | 10.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.8% | 7.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.3% | 12.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.8% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.5% | 5.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Turkey and Laotians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Turkey are Canadian (11.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Welsh (11.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Palestinian (11.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Portuguese (11.6%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (11.6%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Okinawan (11.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Native Hawaiian (11.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Portuguese (11.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (11.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and Palestinian (11.6%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Australians | 94.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 94.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 94.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.5 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Slavs | 93.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Laotians | 92.4 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Okinawans | 92.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Native Hawaiians | 92.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Portuguese | 92.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Palestinians | 91.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Canadians | 91.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 91.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| French Canadians | 91.0 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 90.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | China | 90.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Albanians | 90.3 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 11.7% |