Scottish vs Laotian Poverty
COMPARE
Scottish
Laotian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Scottish
Laotians
11.5%
POVERTY
94.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
100th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.6%
POVERTY
92.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
102nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Scottish vs Laotian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 566,309,495 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.670 and weighted average of 11.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,750,373 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.061 and weighted average of 11.6%, a difference of 0.65%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Scottish | Laotian |
Minimum | 1.9% | 0.072% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 28.0% |
Range | 98.1% | 27.9% |
Mean | 20.9% | 10.3% |
Median | 12.6% | 10.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.8% | 7.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.9% | 12.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.1% | 5.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.4% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.3% | 5.3% |
Demographics Similar to Scottish and Laotians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Scottish are Immigrants from Indonesia (11.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Latvia (11.5%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Egypt (11.5%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from South Africa (11.5%, a difference of 0.31%), and Slavic (11.5%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Okinawan (11.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Native Hawaiian (11.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Portuguese (11.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (11.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and Palestinian (11.6%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Finns | 95.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 11.4% |
British | 95.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Romanians | 94.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Paraguayans | 94.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Australians | 94.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 94.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 94.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 94.5 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Slavs | 93.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Laotians | 92.4 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Okinawans | 92.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Native Hawaiians | 92.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Portuguese | 92.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Palestinians | 91.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Canadians | 91.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 91.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 11.6% |
French Canadians | 91.0 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 11.6% |