Croatian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Croatian
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Croatians
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
19.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
98.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
97th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
95.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
113th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Croatian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,567,193 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Croatians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.361 and weighted average of 19.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,320,666 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.481 and weighted average of 20.0%, a difference of 1.3%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Croatian | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| Minimum | 5.0% | 7.9% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 59.7% |
| Range | 95.0% | 51.9% |
| Mean | 32.0% | 25.1% |
| Median | 22.1% | 21.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.5% | 16.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 40.6% | 33.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 24.0% | 17.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.3% | 13.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 25.1% | 13.2% |
Demographics Similar to Croatians and Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Croatians are Immigrants from Brazil (19.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from France (19.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Estonian (19.7%, a difference of 0.14%), Sierra Leonean (19.7%, a difference of 0.14%), and Ukrainian (19.8%, a difference of 0.39%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Immigrants from Colombia (20.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (20.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Netherlands (20.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Carpatho Rusyn (20.0%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Western Asia (19.9%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Estonians | 98.2 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 98.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Croatians | 98.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Immigrants | France | 97.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 97.9 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Ukrainians | 97.6 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 19.8% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 97.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 19.8% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 97.3 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 19.8% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 97.1 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Chileans | 96.9 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Israelis | 96.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Ethiopians | 96.7 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 96.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Native Hawaiians | 96.6 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Colombians | 96.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 96.5 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 96.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 96.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 95.9 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 95.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 20.0% |