Immigrants from Malaysia vs Immigrants from Spain Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Malaysia
Immigrants from Spain
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Malaysia
Immigrants from Spain
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
86.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
79.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
153rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Immigrants from Spain Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,782,180 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.197 and weighted average of 8.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 239,325,125 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Spain and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.045 and weighted average of 8.6%, a difference of 1.8%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Malaysia | Immigrants from Spain |
Minimum | 1.1% | 0.68% |
Maximum | 26.4% | 27.9% |
Range | 25.3% | 27.3% |
Mean | 8.3% | 7.9% |
Median | 7.1% | 7.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 5.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.6% | 9.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.9% | 4.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 4.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Spain by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Malaysia are Chilean (8.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Brazil (8.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (8.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Armenian (8.5%, a difference of 0.52%), and Immigrants from Nepal (8.5%, a difference of 0.64%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Spain are Samoan (8.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Brazilian (8.6%, a difference of 0.22%), Mongolian (8.6%, a difference of 0.26%), Syrian (8.6%, a difference of 0.26%), and Scotch-Irish (8.6%, a difference of 0.67%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Chileans | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 86.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 86.3 /100 | #136 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 86.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 8.5% |
Armenians | 84.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 84.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 84.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 83.9 /100 | #141 | Excellent 8.5% |
Yugoslavians | 83.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Germany | 83.3 /100 | #143 | Excellent 8.5% |
Albanians | 83.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 83.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 8.5% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 8.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 82.2 /100 | #148 | Excellent 8.6% |
Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |