Israeli vs South African Female Poverty
COMPARE
Israeli
South African
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Israelis
South Africans
13.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
49.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
178th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
88.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Israeli vs South African Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,005,124 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Israelis and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.188 and weighted average of 13.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,540,648 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.636 and weighted average of 12.8%, a difference of 5.2%.

Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Israeli | South African |
| Minimum | 0.76% | 2.6% |
| Maximum | 27.1% | 44.9% |
| Range | 26.4% | 42.4% |
| Mean | 10.6% | 10.8% |
| Median | 10.3% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.9% | 5.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.4% | 13.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.5% | 8.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.6% | 8.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.5% | 8.4% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Israelis by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Israelis are Immigrants from Morocco (13.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Syria (13.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Celtic (13.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Spain (13.4%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Iraq (13.4%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
| Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 13.4% |
| Celtics | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 49.9 /100 | #176 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 49.4 /100 | #177 | Average 13.4% |
| Israelis | 49.1 /100 | #178 | Average 13.5% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 48.8 /100 | #179 | Average 13.5% |
| South Americans | 44.8 /100 | #180 | Average 13.5% |
| Venezuelans | 44.5 /100 | #181 | Average 13.5% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 44.5 /100 | #182 | Average 13.5% |
| Kenyans | 43.8 /100 | #183 | Average 13.5% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 43.2 /100 | #184 | Average 13.5% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 42.0 /100 | #185 | Average 13.5% |
Demographics Similar to South Africans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Immigrants from Belarus (12.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ukraine (12.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Brazil (12.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Argentinean (12.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Norway (12.8%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| New Zealanders | 90.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 90.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| French Canadians | 90.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.9 /100 | #123 | Excellent 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 89.3 /100 | #124 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 88.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 12.8% |
| South Africans | 88.4 /100 | #127 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 88.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 87.9 /100 | #129 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 87.1 /100 | #130 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 87.0 /100 | #131 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 86.9 /100 | #132 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 85.8 /100 | #134 | Excellent 12.9% |