Immigrants from Jordan vs South African Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from Jordan
South African
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from Jordan
South Africans
5.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
80.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
144th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.2%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
70.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
154th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Jordan vs South African Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,116,498 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.274 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,288,157 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.947 and weighted average of 5.2%, a difference of 0.81%.

Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Jordan | South African |
Minimum | 0.20% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 11.7% | 55.0% |
Range | 11.5% | 53.1% |
Mean | 5.2% | 9.9% |
Median | 4.9% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.9% | 4.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.9% | 8.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 4.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 12.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 12.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Jordan and South Africans by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (5.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Palestinian (5.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Oceania (5.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Norway (5.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Eastern Europe (5.1%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Immigrants from Egypt (5.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (5.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Russia (5.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Albanian (5.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Micronesia (5.2%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 83.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | France | 82.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
Palestinians | 80.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 80.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Norway | 79.4 /100 | #146 | Good 5.2% |
Argentineans | 79.2 /100 | #147 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.2% |
Asians | 78.3 /100 | #149 | Good 5.2% |
Egyptians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | China | 75.9 /100 | #151 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Italy | 75.0 /100 | #152 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Greece | 74.9 /100 | #153 | Good 5.2% |
South Africans | 70.8 /100 | #154 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 70.0 /100 | #155 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 69.6 /100 | #156 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Russia | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 5.2% |
Albanians | 68.3 /100 | #158 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 66.9 /100 | #159 | Good 5.2% |