African vs South African Female Poverty
COMPARE
African
South African
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Africans
South Africans
16.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
308th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
88.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
127th/ 347
METRIC RANK
African vs South African Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 469,508,235 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Africans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.189 and weighted average of 16.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,540,648 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.636 and weighted average of 12.8%, a difference of 32.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | African | South African |
| Minimum | 0.38% | 2.6% |
| Maximum | 69.8% | 44.9% |
| Range | 69.4% | 42.4% |
| Mean | 22.8% | 10.8% |
| Median | 20.8% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.6% | 5.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.8% | 13.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.2% | 8.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.0% | 8.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.9% | 8.4% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Africans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Africans are Seminole (16.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Caribbean (16.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Mexico (17.0%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Grenada (16.8%, a difference of 0.45%), and Immigrants from Central America (16.8%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |
Demographics Similar to South Africans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Immigrants from Belarus (12.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ukraine (12.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Brazil (12.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Argentinean (12.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Norway (12.8%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| New Zealanders | 90.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 90.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| French Canadians | 90.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.9 /100 | #123 | Excellent 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 89.3 /100 | #124 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 88.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 12.8% |
| South Africans | 88.4 /100 | #127 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 88.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 87.9 /100 | #129 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 87.1 /100 | #130 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 87.0 /100 | #131 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 86.9 /100 | #132 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 85.8 /100 | #134 | Excellent 12.9% |