Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Immigrants from South Central Asia
10.4%
POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
13th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.2%
POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,892,762 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.117 and weighted average of 10.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,664,539 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.610 and weighted average of 10.2%, a difference of 2.0%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 0.44% |
| Maximum | 16.6% | 18.0% |
| Range | 15.1% | 17.6% |
| Mean | 8.8% | 7.3% |
| Median | 8.9% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.7% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.1% | 9.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.4% | 4.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.0% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 3.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from South Central Asia by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Bhutanese (10.4%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Bolivia (10.4%, a difference of 0.31%), Bolivian (10.4%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Lithuania (10.3%, a difference of 0.57%), and Lithuanian (10.5%, a difference of 0.62%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia are Bulgarian (10.2%, a difference of 0.41%), Maltese (10.2%, a difference of 0.45%), Filipino (10.1%, a difference of 0.87%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (10.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and Immigrants from Ireland (10.1%, a difference of 1.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 10.6% |