Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Greek Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Greek
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Greeks
10.4%
POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
13th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.7%
POVERTY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
29th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Greek Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,892,762 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.117 and weighted average of 10.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 482,333,537 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Greeks and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.748 and weighted average of 10.7%, a difference of 3.0%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Greek |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 0.75% |
| Maximum | 16.6% | 93.0% |
| Range | 15.1% | 92.3% |
| Mean | 8.8% | 15.2% |
| Median | 8.9% | 10.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.7% | 7.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.1% | 16.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.4% | 9.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.0% | 16.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 16.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong and Greeks by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Bhutanese (10.4%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Bolivia (10.4%, a difference of 0.31%), Bolivian (10.4%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Lithuania (10.3%, a difference of 0.57%), and Lithuanian (10.5%, a difference of 0.62%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Greeks are Danish (10.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Korea (10.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Polish (10.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (10.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and Burmese (10.7%, a difference of 0.52%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.5 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Danes | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 10.7% |