Greek vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Poverty
COMPARE
Greek
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Greeks
Immigrants from South Central Asia
10.7%
POVERTY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
29th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.2%
POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Greek vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 482,333,537 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Greeks and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.748 and weighted average of 10.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,664,539 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.610 and weighted average of 10.2%, a difference of 5.1%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Greek | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
Minimum | 0.75% | 0.44% |
Maximum | 93.0% | 18.0% |
Range | 92.3% | 17.6% |
Mean | 15.2% | 7.3% |
Median | 10.1% | 7.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.2% | 4.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.6% | 9.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.4% | 4.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.5% | 3.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.4% | 3.4% |
Demographics Similar to Greeks and Immigrants from South Central Asia by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Greeks are Immigrants from Korea (10.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (10.7%, a difference of 0.16%), Burmese (10.7%, a difference of 0.52%), Croatian (10.6%, a difference of 0.83%), and Italian (10.6%, a difference of 1.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia are Bulgarian (10.2%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Lithuania (10.3%, a difference of 1.4%), Bhutanese (10.4%, a difference of 1.8%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (10.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and Immigrants from Bolivia (10.4%, a difference of 2.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Italians | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.5 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 10.7% |