Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Danish Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Hong Kong
 Danish
 Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Danes
10.4%
POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
13th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.7%
POVERTY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
30th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Danish Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,892,762 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.117 and weighted average of 10.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 473,839,079 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Danes and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.375 and weighted average of 10.7%, a difference of 3.0%.
 
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Danish | 
| Minimum | 1.5% | 1.9% | 
| Maximum | 16.6% | 51.6% | 
| Range | 15.1% | 49.7% | 
| Mean | 8.8% | 11.9% | 
| Median | 8.9% | 10.0% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.7% | 7.7% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.1% | 13.9% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.4% | 6.2% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.0% | 7.6% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 7.6% | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong and Danes by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Bhutanese (10.4%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Bolivia (10.4%, a difference of 0.31%), Bolivian (10.4%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Lithuania (10.3%, a difference of 0.57%), and Lithuanian (10.5%, a difference of 0.62%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are Greek (10.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Polish (10.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Korea (10.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (10.7%, a difference of 0.17%), and Burmese (10.7%, a difference of 0.53%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty | 
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #11  | Exceptional 10.3%  | 
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #12  | Exceptional 10.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #13  | Exceptional 10.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #14  | Exceptional 10.4%  | 
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #15  | Exceptional 10.4%  | 
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #16  | Exceptional 10.5%  | 
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17  | Exceptional 10.5%  | 
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #18  | Exceptional 10.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #19  | Exceptional 10.6%  | 
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.7 /100 | #20  | Exceptional 10.6%  | 
| Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #21  | Exceptional 10.6%  | 
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #22  | Exceptional 10.6%  | 
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #23  | Exceptional 10.6%  | 
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #24  | Exceptional 10.6%  | 
| Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #25  | Exceptional 10.6%  | 
| Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #26  | Exceptional 10.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #27  | Exceptional 10.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.5 /100 | #28  | Exceptional 10.7%  | 
| Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #29  | Exceptional 10.7%  | 
| Danes | 99.5 /100 | #30  | Exceptional 10.7%  | 
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31  | Exceptional 10.7%  |