Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Canadian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Costa Rica
Canadian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Costa Rica
Canadians
20.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
61.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
168th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
45.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
176th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Canadian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,952,607 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.094 and weighted average of 20.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 428,352,495 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Canadians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.416 and weighted average of 21.1%, a difference of 1.0%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Costa Rica | Canadian |
| Minimum | 7.4% | 13.6% |
| Maximum | 52.6% | 100.0% |
| Range | 45.2% | 86.4% |
| Mean | 22.0% | 39.9% |
| Median | 20.6% | 32.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.6% | 24.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.4% | 53.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.8% | 28.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.8% | 22.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.7% | 21.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica and Canadians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica are Immigrants from Norway (20.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Norwegian (20.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Ugandan (20.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Iraqi (20.8%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (20.9%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Canadians are Scandinavian (21.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (21.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Czech (21.0%, a difference of 0.080%), British (21.1%, a difference of 0.16%), and Spanish American Indian (21.1%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
| Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
| Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
| Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
| Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
| New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
| Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
| Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
| Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
| Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
| Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
| Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |
| British | 42.9 /100 | #179 | Average 21.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 42.5 /100 | #180 | Average 21.1% |
| Europeans | 42.3 /100 | #181 | Average 21.1% |
| Slavs | 40.5 /100 | #182 | Average 21.1% |