Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Luxembourger Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Costa Rica
Luxembourger
Disability
Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Costa Rica
Luxembourgers
11.4%
DISABILITY
93.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
121st/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.3%
DISABILITY
93.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
117th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Luxembourger Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 204,275,653 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.191 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,681,066 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.116 and weighted average of 11.3%, a difference of 0.080%.
Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Costa Rica | Luxembourger |
Minimum | 3.5% | 3.1% |
Maximum | 23.1% | 26.9% |
Range | 19.6% | 23.7% |
Mean | 11.0% | 11.8% |
Median | 10.5% | 11.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.8% | 9.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.4% | 12.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 3.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 4.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica and Luxembourgers by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica are Central American (11.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (11.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Brazilian (11.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Korean (11.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Northern Europe (11.3%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Korean (11.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (11.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Central American (11.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (11.4%, a difference of 0.070%), and Brazilian (11.4%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
Immigrants | Uganda | 95.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 95.4 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 94.9 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Guyanese | 94.7 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Syria | 94.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 94.6 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 94.1 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Luxembourgers | 93.9 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Koreans | 93.8 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Central Americans | 93.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 93.5 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 93.4 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Brazilians | 93.3 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 11.4% |
South Africans | 92.3 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 11.4% |
South American Indians | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Costa Ricans | 91.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 90.9 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Italy | 90.4 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Europe | 90.4 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Macedonians | 90.3 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 11.4% |