Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Zimbabwean Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Zimbabwean
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Zimbabweans
12.0%
POVERTY
73.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.3%
POVERTY
97.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
71st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Zimbabwean Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 156,765,120 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.145 and weighted average of 12.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,186,100 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.175 and weighted average of 11.3%, a difference of 6.7%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina | Zimbabwean |
| Minimum | 2.3% | 2.0% |
| Maximum | 26.2% | 19.3% |
| Range | 23.9% | 17.3% |
| Mean | 10.5% | 9.1% |
| Median | 10.2% | 8.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.4% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.8% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 6.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 4.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 4.5% |
Similar Demographics by Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina are Immigrants from Germany (12.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Malaysia (12.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Afghan (12.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (12.0%, a difference of 0.17%), and Syrian (12.0%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | Peru | 81.1 /100 | #140 | Excellent 11.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 80.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 11.9% |
| Basques | 80.4 /100 | #142 | Excellent 11.9% |
| Brazilians | 79.7 /100 | #143 | Good 11.9% |
| Icelanders | 77.9 /100 | #144 | Good 11.9% |
| Syrians | 75.1 /100 | #145 | Good 12.0% |
| Afghans | 74.9 /100 | #146 | Good 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 73.7 /100 | #147 | Good 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 72.7 /100 | #148 | Good 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 72.7 /100 | #149 | Good 12.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 72.3 /100 | #150 | Good 12.0% |
| Samoans | 71.9 /100 | #151 | Good 12.0% |
| Armenians | 67.6 /100 | #152 | Good 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 63.9 /100 | #153 | Good 12.1% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 63.9 /100 | #154 | Good 12.1% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Canada (11.3%, a difference of 0.020%), European (11.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Belgium (11.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Carpatho Rusyn (11.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and Serbian (11.2%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Swiss | 97.7 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 97.5 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.5 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 97.4 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Slovaks | 97.4 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Serbians | 97.4 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 97.3 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Zimbabweans | 97.3 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Europeans | 97.2 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 97.2 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 97.2 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 97.0 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | North America | 96.8 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 96.7 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Dutch | 96.7 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 11.3% |