Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Israeli Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 155,858,187 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.123 and weighted average of 16.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 208,424,853 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Israelis and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.450 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 3.2%.

Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina	Israeli
Minimum	2.4%	2.9%
Maximum	38.5%	34.4%
Range	36.2%	31.5%
Mean	15.8%	16.1%
Median	14.3%	15.5%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	11.0%	9.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	18.4%	21.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	7.4%	11.6%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	8.2%	8.3%
Standard Deviation (Population)	8.1%	8.2%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Israelis by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina are Immigrants from Ethiopia (16.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Colombia (16.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Tsimshian (16.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (16.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and South American (16.3%, a difference of 0.40%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Israelis are French Canadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nepal (15.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Yugoslavian (15.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Syrian (15.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Chile (15.9%, a difference of 0.27%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
French	78.7 /100 \| #153	Good 15.8%
Syrians	77.5 /100 \| #154	Good 15.9%
French Canadians	76.6 /100 \| #155	Good 15.9%
Israelis	76.5 /100 \| #156	Good 15.9%
Immigrants \| Nepal	76.0 /100 \| #157	Good 15.9%
Yugoslavians	75.9 /100 \| #158	Good 15.9%
Immigrants \| Chile	74.8 /100 \| #159	Good 15.9%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	71.3 /100 \| #160	Good 16.0%
Immigrants \| Oceania	71.3 /100 \| #161	Good 16.0%
Guamanians/Chamorros	69.6 /100 \| #162	Good 16.1%
Costa Ricans	68.1 /100 \| #163	Good 16.1%
Immigrants \| Albania	67.9 /100 \| #164	Good 16.1%
Colombians	65.2 /100 \| #165	Good 16.1%
Immigrants \| Germany	63.6 /100 \| #166	Good 16.2%
Afghans	55.4 /100 \| #167	Average 16.3%
South Americans	55.3 /100 \| #168	Average 16.3%
Immigrants \| Saudi Arabia	53.6 /100 \| #169	Average 16.4%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	51.7 /100 \| #170	Average 16.4%
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	51.3 /100 \| #171	Average 16.4%
Immigrants \| Colombia	50.8 /100 \| #172	Average 16.4%
Tsimshian	50.5 /100 \| #173	Average 16.4%