Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Cuban Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Cuban
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina
Cubans
21.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
44.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
178th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
50.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
174th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Cuban Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 155,809,580 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 21.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 441,584,431 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Cubans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.234 and weighted average of 21.0%, a difference of 0.32%.

Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina | Cuban |
Minimum | 10.2% | 7.2% |
Maximum | 42.7% | 48.3% |
Range | 32.5% | 41.1% |
Mean | 21.6% | 20.6% |
Median | 19.8% | 20.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.5% | 16.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.0% | 24.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 8.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.5% | 6.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.4% | 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Cubans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina are Scandinavian (21.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Canadian (21.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Czech (21.0%, a difference of 0.12%), British (21.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and Spanish American Indian (21.1%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cubans are Immigrants from Guyana (21.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Guyanese (21.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Moroccan (21.0%, a difference of 0.17%), New Zealander (21.0%, a difference of 0.20%), and Czech (21.0%, a difference of 0.20%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |
British | 42.9 /100 | #179 | Average 21.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 42.5 /100 | #180 | Average 21.1% |
Europeans | 42.3 /100 | #181 | Average 21.1% |
Slavs | 40.5 /100 | #182 | Average 21.1% |
Slovaks | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 21.1% |
Hungarians | 39.6 /100 | #184 | Fair 21.1% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 38.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 21.2% |
Hawaiians | 37.7 /100 | #186 | Fair 21.2% |