Immigrants from Belarus vs Soviet Union Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Belarus
Soviet Union
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Belarus
Soviet Union
19.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
74th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
91st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Belarus vs Soviet Union Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,021,334 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.175 and weighted average of 19.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,439,502 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.649 and weighted average of 19.6%, a difference of 1.1%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Belarus | Soviet Union |
Minimum | 5.6% | 3.3% |
Maximum | 51.6% | 100.0% |
Range | 46.1% | 96.7% |
Mean | 20.8% | 20.7% |
Median | 18.5% | 18.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.5% | 10.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.1% | 20.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.6% | 10.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.1% | 19.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.0% | 18.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Belarus and Soviet Union by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belarus are Immigrants from Peru (19.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Turkey (19.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Peruvian (19.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Latvia (19.3%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Russia (19.4%, a difference of 0.20%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Italian (19.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Lebanon (19.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Ukraine (19.5%, a difference of 0.24%), Afghan (19.5%, a difference of 0.25%), and Zimbabwean (19.5%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Latvia | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Peru | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 19.3% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 99.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Peruvians | 99.4 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Russia | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Albanians | 99.3 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 99.3 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.3 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Taiwanese | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Albania | 99.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Zimbabweans | 99.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Afghans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Soviet Union | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 19.6% |
Italians | 98.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 19.6% |