Immigrants from Belarus vs Immigrants from Turkey Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Belarus
Immigrants from Turkey
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Belarus
Immigrants from Turkey
10.7%
MALE POVERTY
83.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
131st/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.6%
MALE POVERTY
89.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
112th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Belarus vs Immigrants from Turkey Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 150,164,106 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.074 and weighted average of 10.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,940,059 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Turkey and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.597 and weighted average of 10.6%, a difference of 1.4%.

Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Belarus | Immigrants from Turkey |
Minimum | 0.12% | 4.4% |
Maximum | 26.1% | 80.0% |
Range | 25.9% | 75.6% |
Mean | 10.6% | 13.2% |
Median | 9.5% | 8.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.2% | 7.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.5% | 13.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.3% | 6.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 16.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 15.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Turkey by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belarus are Chilean (10.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Peru (10.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Western Europe (10.7%, a difference of 0.17%), Puget Sound Salish (10.7%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Ukraine (10.7%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Turkey are Immigrants from Argentina (10.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Palestinian (10.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Brazil (10.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Russia (10.6%, a difference of 0.24%), and Sri Lankan (10.6%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Argentina | 89.8 /100 | #111 | Excellent 10.6% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 89.5 /100 | #112 | Excellent 10.6% |
Palestinians | 89.1 /100 | #113 | Excellent 10.6% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 89.0 /100 | #114 | Excellent 10.6% |
Immigrants | Russia | 88.6 /100 | #115 | Excellent 10.6% |
Sri Lankans | 88.1 /100 | #116 | Excellent 10.6% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 88.1 /100 | #117 | Excellent 10.6% |
Okinawans | 87.6 /100 | #118 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 87.6 /100 | #119 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | China | 87.1 /100 | #120 | Excellent 10.7% |
Peruvians | 87.1 /100 | #121 | Excellent 10.7% |
Native Hawaiians | 87.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 10.7% |
South Africans | 86.8 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.7% |
French | 86.7 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Norway | 86.0 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 84.3 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.7% |
Puget Sound Salish | 84.3 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 84.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Peru | 84.1 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.7% |
Chileans | 83.9 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 83.3 /100 | #131 | Excellent 10.7% |