Immigrants from Belarus vs Immigrants from Peru Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Belarus
Immigrants from Peru
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Belarus
Immigrants from Peru
12.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
88.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
128th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
79.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Belarus vs Immigrants from Peru Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 150,175,369 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.410 and weighted average of 12.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 328,728,905 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Peru and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.450 and weighted average of 13.0%, a difference of 1.7%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Belarus | Immigrants from Peru |
Minimum | 2.1% | 0.21% |
Maximum | 41.3% | 56.3% |
Range | 39.2% | 56.1% |
Mean | 12.1% | 14.4% |
Median | 10.5% | 12.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.3% | 11.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.9% | 16.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 5.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.5% | 7.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.5% | 7.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Peru by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belarus are South African (12.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Brazil (12.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Vietnam (12.8%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Argentina (12.8%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Jordan (12.8%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Peru are Syrian (13.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (13.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Afghan (13.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Malaysia (13.0%, a difference of 0.19%), and Brazilian (13.0%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
South Africans | 88.4 /100 | #127 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 88.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 87.9 /100 | #129 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 87.1 /100 | #130 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 87.0 /100 | #131 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 86.9 /100 | #132 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 85.8 /100 | #134 | Excellent 12.9% |
French | 85.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 12.9% |
Peruvians | 85.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.9% |
Chileans | 84.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.9% |
Immigrants | France | 83.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.9% |
Basques | 83.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 12.9% |
Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 12.9% |
Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
Afghans | 79.8 /100 | #144 | Good 13.0% |
Syrians | 79.6 /100 | #145 | Good 13.0% |
Immigrants | Peru | 79.1 /100 | #146 | Good 13.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 13.0% |