Guamanian/Chamorro vs Native Hawaiian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Guamanian/Chamorro
Native Hawaiian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Guamanians/Chamorros
Native Hawaiians
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
62.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
162nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
95.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
98th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Native Hawaiian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,860,928 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.792 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 331,828,170 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.359 and weighted average of 12.5%, a difference of 6.4%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Guamanian/Chamorro | Native Hawaiian |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 2.1% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 30.4% |
| Range | 98.8% | 28.2% |
| Mean | 17.2% | 12.6% |
| Median | 11.7% | 11.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.0% | 8.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.6% | 15.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.6% | 7.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.9% | 5.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.6% | 5.8% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Guamanians/Chamorros by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Guamanians/Chamorros are Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (13.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Ethiopian (13.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nepal (13.3%, a difference of 0.030%), and Scotch-Irish (13.3%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
Demographics Similar to Native Hawaiians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Native Hawaiians are Australian (12.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Romanian (12.5%, a difference of 0.020%), British (12.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Africa (12.5%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (12.5%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.5% |