Guamanian/Chamorro vs Bhutanese Female Poverty
COMPARE
Guamanian/Chamorro
Bhutanese
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Guamanians/Chamorros
Bhutanese
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
62.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
162nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
12th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Bhutanese Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,860,928 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.792 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,052,143 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.207 and weighted average of 11.3%, a difference of 17.7%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Guamanian/Chamorro | Bhutanese |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 2.5% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 66.7% |
| Range | 98.8% | 64.2% |
| Mean | 17.2% | 11.1% |
| Median | 11.7% | 9.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.0% | 7.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.6% | 12.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.6% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.9% | 8.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.6% | 8.5% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Guamanians/Chamorros by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Guamanians/Chamorros are Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (13.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Ethiopian (13.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nepal (13.3%, a difference of 0.030%), and Scotch-Irish (13.3%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Lithuania (11.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Maltese (11.2%, a difference of 0.46%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (11.2%, a difference of 0.57%), Lithuanian (11.4%, a difference of 0.97%), and Latvian (11.4%, a difference of 1.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.5% |