Immigrants from Indonesia vs Native Hawaiian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Indonesia
Native Hawaiian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Indonesia
Native Hawaiians
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
95.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
94th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
95.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
98th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Indonesia vs Native Hawaiian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,706,539 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Indonesia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.519 and weighted average of 12.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 331,828,170 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.359 and weighted average of 12.5%, a difference of 0.17%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Indonesia | Native Hawaiian |
| Minimum | 0.67% | 2.1% |
| Maximum | 45.9% | 30.4% |
| Range | 45.2% | 28.2% |
| Mean | 11.9% | 12.6% |
| Median | 10.7% | 11.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.6% | 8.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.8% | 15.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 7.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.1% | 5.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.0% | 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Indonesia and Native Hawaiians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Indonesia are Immigrants from Egypt (12.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South Africa (12.5%, a difference of 0.040%), British (12.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Australian (12.5%, a difference of 0.14%), and Romanian (12.5%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Native Hawaiians are Australian (12.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Romanian (12.5%, a difference of 0.020%), British (12.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Africa (12.5%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Latvia (12.5%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Dutch | 96.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Okinawans | 96.4 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Finns | 96.4 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| English | 96.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |