Guamanian/Chamorro vs Immigrants from Belarus Male Poverty
COMPARE
Guamanian/Chamorro
Immigrants from Belarus
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Guamanians/Chamorros
Immigrants from Belarus
11.0%
MALE POVERTY
67.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.7%
MALE POVERTY
83.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
131st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Immigrants from Belarus Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,842,342 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.207 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 150,164,106 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.074 and weighted average of 10.7%, a difference of 2.2%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Guamanian/Chamorro | Immigrants from Belarus |
Minimum | 0.76% | 0.12% |
Maximum | 40.6% | 26.1% |
Range | 39.9% | 25.9% |
Mean | 12.3% | 10.6% |
Median | 10.0% | 9.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.6% | 7.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.7% | 12.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.1% | 5.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.5% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.3% | 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Guamanians/Chamorros and Immigrants from Belarus by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Guamanians/Chamorros are Immigrants from Venezuela (11.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Armenian (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Icelander (11.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Syrian (10.9%, a difference of 0.45%), and Immigrants from Germany (10.9%, a difference of 0.48%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belarus are Immigrants from Vietnam (10.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Pakistani (10.8%, a difference of 0.060%), New Zealander (10.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Chilean (10.7%, a difference of 0.11%), and Brazilian (10.8%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Chileans | 83.9 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 83.3 /100 | #131 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 83.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 10.8% |
Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #133 | Excellent 10.8% |
New Zealanders | 82.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 10.8% |
Brazilians | 82.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 10.8% |
Immigrants | Israel | 80.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 10.8% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 79.2 /100 | #137 | Good 10.8% |
Yugoslavians | 78.2 /100 | #138 | Good 10.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 77.5 /100 | #139 | Good 10.8% |
Tlingit-Haida | 76.1 /100 | #140 | Good 10.9% |
Immigrants | France | 75.8 /100 | #141 | Good 10.9% |
Basques | 74.6 /100 | #142 | Good 10.9% |
Afghans | 71.9 /100 | #143 | Good 10.9% |
Samoans | 71.8 /100 | #144 | Good 10.9% |
Immigrants | Germany | 71.6 /100 | #145 | Good 10.9% |
Syrians | 71.4 /100 | #146 | Good 10.9% |
Icelanders | 68.5 /100 | #147 | Good 11.0% |
Armenians | 68.0 /100 | #148 | Good 11.0% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 67.9 /100 | #149 | Good 11.0% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 67.6 /100 | #150 | Good 11.0% |