Dutch West Indian vs Seminole Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Dutch West Indian
Seminole
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Dutch West Indians
Seminole
6.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
284th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
282nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Dutch West Indian vs Seminole Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,614,682 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Dutch West Indians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.546 and weighted average of 6.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,024,519 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Seminole and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.372 and weighted average of 6.4%, a difference of 0.50%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Dutch West Indian | Seminole |
| Minimum | 3.6% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 25.0% | 33.3% |
| Range | 21.4% | 31.9% |
| Mean | 9.2% | 9.4% |
| Median | 6.7% | 7.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.6% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.6% | 10.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.0% | 5.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.0% | 6.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Dutch West Indians and Seminole by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Dutch West Indians are Ute (6.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Mexican American Indian (6.4%, a difference of 0.50%), Black/African American (6.5%, a difference of 0.51%), Guyanese (6.5%, a difference of 0.61%), and Ecuadorian (6.5%, a difference of 0.99%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Seminole are Mexican American Indian (6.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Ute (6.4%, a difference of 0.38%), West Indian (6.4%, a difference of 0.51%), Houma (6.4%, a difference of 0.56%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (6.4%, a difference of 0.81%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Colville | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Barbadians | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Choctaw | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Yaqui | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Indonesians | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 6.3% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 6.4% |
| West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Salvadorans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 6.6% |