Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Bangladeshi Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,946,010 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bangladesh and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.484 and weighted average of 19.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,467,619 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.412 and weighted average of 20.0%, a difference of 0.74%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Bangladesh	Bangladeshi
Minimum	7.2%	0.72%
Maximum	51.8%	54.5%
Range	44.6%	53.8%
Mean	21.3%	22.6%
Median	17.1%	20.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	14.3%	14.7%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	26.1%	29.3%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	11.8%	14.6%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	10.9%	11.2%
Standard Deviation (Population)	10.9%	11.1%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bangladesh and Bangladeshis by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bangladesh are Spanish American Indian (19.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Liberian (19.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Spanish American (19.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Cherokee (19.9%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from Barbados (19.9%, a difference of 0.42%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bangladeshis are Immigrants from El Salvador (20.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Barbados (19.9%, a difference of 0.31%), Cherokee (19.9%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (20.1%, a difference of 0.42%), and Subsaharan African (20.1%, a difference of 0.57%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Mexican American Indians	0.2 /100 \| #260	Tragic 19.5%
Vietnamese	0.2 /100 \| #261	Tragic 19.5%
Chickasaw	0.1 /100 \| #262	Tragic 19.6%
Immigrants \| Burma/Myanmar	0.1 /100 \| #263	Tragic 19.7%
Jamaicans	0.1 /100 \| #264	Tragic 19.7%
Immigrants \| Jamaica	0.1 /100 \| #265	Tragic 19.8%
Spanish Americans	0.1 /100 \| #266	Tragic 19.8%
Immigrants \| Bangladesh	0.1 /100 \| #267	Tragic 19.9%
Spanish American Indians	0.1 /100 \| #268	Tragic 19.9%
Liberians	0.1 /100 \| #269	Tragic 19.9%
Cherokee	0.1 /100 \| #270	Tragic 19.9%
Immigrants \| Barbados	0.1 /100 \| #271	Tragic 19.9%
Immigrants \| El Salvador	0.1 /100 \| #272	Tragic 20.0%
Bangladeshis	0.1 /100 \| #273	Tragic 20.0%
Immigrants \| St. Vincent and the Grenadines	0.0 /100 \| #274	Tragic 20.1%
Sub-Saharan Africans	0.0 /100 \| #275	Tragic 20.1%
Comanche	0.0 /100 \| #276	Tragic 20.2%
Belizeans	0.0 /100 \| #277	Tragic 20.2%
Barbadians	0.0 /100 \| #278	Tragic 20.2%
Immigrants \| Zaire	0.0 /100 \| #279	Tragic 20.2%
Immigrants \| Liberia	0.0 /100 \| #280	Tragic 20.2%