Swiss vs Norwegian Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
COMPARE
Swiss
Norwegian
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Comparison
Swiss
Norwegians
9.2%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
19th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.7%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
3rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Swiss vs Norwegian Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 462,823,104 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.516 and weighted average of 9.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 529,132,096 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.438 and weighted average of 8.7%, a difference of 6.0%.
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Swiss | Norwegian |
Minimum | 3.4% | 2.6% |
Maximum | 68.4% | 75.0% |
Range | 65.1% | 72.4% |
Mean | 12.6% | 11.7% |
Median | 8.3% | 8.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.4% | 7.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.5% | 11.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.0% | 10.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.9% | 10.1% |
Demographics Similar to Swiss and Norwegians by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Thai (9.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Slovak (9.2%, a difference of 0.29%), Scottish (9.2%, a difference of 0.32%), European (9.2%, a difference of 0.43%), and Luxembourger (9.2%, a difference of 0.43%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Swedish (8.7%, a difference of 0.60%), Immigrants from India (8.8%, a difference of 0.96%), Danish (8.8%, a difference of 1.4%), German (9.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and Czech (9.0%, a difference of 3.6%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Tlingit-Haida | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 8.8% |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 8.8% |
Germans | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.0% |
English | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Scandinavians | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Croatians | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Poles | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Dutch | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Scottish | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Slovaks | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Thais | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.2% |