Chinese vs Norwegian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Chinese
Norwegian
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Chinese
Norwegians
11.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
5th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Norwegian Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,708,230 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.283 and weighted average of 11.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 516,210,620 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.336 and weighted average of 13.2%, a difference of 11.1%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Norwegian |
| Minimum | 0.70% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 58.3% | 70.0% |
| Range | 57.6% | 68.4% |
| Mean | 14.1% | 14.7% |
| Median | 10.7% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 10.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.9% | 15.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.7% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.9% | 9.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.8% | 9.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Norwegians by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Thai (11.7%, a difference of 1.6%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.3%, a difference of 3.3%), Iranian (12.4%, a difference of 4.9%), Immigrants from Singapore (12.5%, a difference of 5.2%), and Immigrants from Iran (12.5%, a difference of 5.8%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Maltese (13.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Japan (13.1%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Ireland (13.1%, a difference of 0.51%), Bulgarian (13.3%, a difference of 0.53%), and Bolivian (13.3%, a difference of 0.59%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.2% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.2% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Indians (Asian) | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.3% |