British vs Dutch Female Poverty
COMPARE
British
Dutch
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
British
Dutch
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
95.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
96th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
96.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
86th/ 347
METRIC RANK
British vs Dutch Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 530,738,327 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of British and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.656 and weighted average of 12.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 553,347,784 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Dutch and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.188 and weighted average of 12.4%, a difference of 0.82%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | British | Dutch |
| Minimum | 2.7% | 0.60% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 33.9% |
| Range | 97.3% | 33.3% |
| Mean | 18.5% | 10.5% |
| Median | 12.4% | 9.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.8% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.6% | 12.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.8% | 6.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.3% | 5.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.1% | 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to British and Dutch by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to British are Australian (12.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Native Hawaiian (12.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Africa (12.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Romanian (12.5%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (12.5%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Dutch are Okinawan (12.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Irish (12.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Finnish (12.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Northern European (12.4%, a difference of 0.080%), and English (12.4%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 97.1 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | England | 96.9 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Northern Europeans | 96.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Irish | 96.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Dutch | 96.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Okinawans | 96.4 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Finns | 96.4 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| English | 96.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |