British vs Immigrants from North America Female Poverty
COMPARE
British
Immigrants from North America
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
British
Immigrants from North America
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
95.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
96th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
97.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
79th/ 347
METRIC RANK
British vs Immigrants from North America Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 530,738,327 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of British and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.656 and weighted average of 12.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 462,028,692 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from North America and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.657 and weighted average of 12.3%, a difference of 1.4%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | British | Immigrants from North America |
Minimum | 2.7% | 3.5% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 97.3% | 96.5% |
Mean | 18.5% | 26.2% |
Median | 12.4% | 16.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.8% | 10.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.6% | 28.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.8% | 17.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.3% | 24.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.1% | 24.2% |
Demographics Similar to British and Immigrants from North America by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to British are Australian (12.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South Africa (12.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Indonesia (12.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Egypt (12.5%, a difference of 0.14%), and Czechoslovakian (12.4%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from North America are Slovak (12.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Sweden (12.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Jordanian (12.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Egyptian (12.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and Serbian (12.3%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Egyptians | 97.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | North America | 97.1 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Slovaks | 97.1 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 97.1 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | England | 96.9 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Northern Europeans | 96.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Irish | 96.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Dutch | 96.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Okinawans | 96.4 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Finns | 96.4 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.4% |
English | 96.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |