Black/African American vs French Canadian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Black/African American
French Canadian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Blacks/African Americans
French Canadians
24.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
333rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
68.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
162nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Black/African American vs French Canadian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 546,554,396 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Blacks/African Americans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.837 and weighted average of 24.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 487,191,826 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of French Canadians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.410 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 53.1%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Black/African American | French Canadian |
Minimum | 12.6% | 2.6% |
Maximum | 65.8% | 100.0% |
Range | 53.1% | 97.4% |
Mean | 28.6% | 27.4% |
Median | 28.6% | 17.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.1% | 14.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 34.0% | 29.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.9% | 15.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.2% | 23.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.2% | 23.5% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Blacks/African Americans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Blacks/African Americans are Menominee (25.0%, a difference of 1.5%), Pueblo (25.2%, a difference of 2.2%), Native/Alaskan (24.0%, a difference of 2.5%), Apache (23.8%, a difference of 3.4%), and Immigrants from Dominican Republic (23.8%, a difference of 3.5%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 22.8% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 22.8% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 23.7% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 23.7% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 23.8% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 23.8% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 24.0% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 25.0% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 25.2% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.6% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 26.3% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
Demographics Similar to French Canadians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to French Canadians are Immigrants from Oceania (16.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Colombia (16.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Germany (16.1%, a difference of 0.19%), South American (16.1%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (16.0%, a difference of 0.47%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Syrians | 76.7 /100 | #155 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 76.1 /100 | #156 | Good 15.9% |
Colombians | 76.1 /100 | #157 | Good 15.9% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 75.3 /100 | #158 | Good 15.9% |
Slovaks | 75.2 /100 | #159 | Good 15.9% |
French | 72.8 /100 | #160 | Good 16.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 72.0 /100 | #161 | Good 16.0% |
French Canadians | 68.7 /100 | #162 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 68.4 /100 | #163 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 67.8 /100 | #164 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 67.3 /100 | #165 | Good 16.1% |
South Americans | 67.2 /100 | #166 | Good 16.1% |
Uruguayans | 64.7 /100 | #167 | Good 16.2% |
Yugoslavians | 64.4 /100 | #168 | Good 16.2% |
Costa Ricans | 64.2 /100 | #169 | Good 16.2% |