Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs French Canadian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
French Canadian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
French Canadians
17.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
21.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
200th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
68.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
162nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs French Canadian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,883,123 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uzbekistan and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.096 and weighted average of 17.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 487,191,826 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of French Canadians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.410 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 6.1%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Uzbekistan | French Canadian |
Minimum | 0.85% | 2.6% |
Maximum | 48.6% | 100.0% |
Range | 47.8% | 97.4% |
Mean | 16.4% | 27.4% |
Median | 14.1% | 17.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.9% | 14.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.8% | 29.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.9% | 15.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.4% | 23.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.3% | 23.5% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan are Immigrants from Afghanistan (17.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Lebanon (17.1%, a difference of 0.18%), Spaniard (17.0%, a difference of 0.53%), Celtic (17.0%, a difference of 0.59%), and Immigrants from Costa Rica (17.0%, a difference of 0.64%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Aleuts | 28.7 /100 | #193 | Fair 16.9% |
Spanish | 28.6 /100 | #194 | Fair 16.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 25.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 17.0% |
Celtics | 25.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 17.0% |
Spaniards | 24.9 /100 | #197 | Fair 17.0% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 22.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 22.4 /100 | #199 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 17.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 17.2% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 17.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 17.2% |
Ugandans | 17.5 /100 | #203 | Poor 17.2% |
Iraqis | 13.0 /100 | #204 | Poor 17.4% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 12.6 /100 | #205 | Poor 17.4% |
Delaware | 11.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 17.4% |
Hmong | 10.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 17.5% |
Demographics Similar to French Canadians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to French Canadians are Immigrants from Oceania (16.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Colombia (16.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Germany (16.1%, a difference of 0.19%), South American (16.1%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (16.0%, a difference of 0.47%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Syrians | 76.7 /100 | #155 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 76.1 /100 | #156 | Good 15.9% |
Colombians | 76.1 /100 | #157 | Good 15.9% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 75.3 /100 | #158 | Good 15.9% |
Slovaks | 75.2 /100 | #159 | Good 15.9% |
French | 72.8 /100 | #160 | Good 16.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 72.0 /100 | #161 | Good 16.0% |
French Canadians | 68.7 /100 | #162 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 68.4 /100 | #163 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 67.8 /100 | #164 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 67.3 /100 | #165 | Good 16.1% |
South Americans | 67.2 /100 | #166 | Good 16.1% |
Uruguayans | 64.7 /100 | #167 | Good 16.2% |
Yugoslavians | 64.4 /100 | #168 | Good 16.2% |
Costa Ricans | 64.2 /100 | #169 | Good 16.2% |