Bhutanese vs White/Caucasian Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Bhutanese
White/Caucasian
Receiving Food Stamps
Receiving Food Stamps Comparison
Bhutanese
Whites/Caucasians
9.2%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
27th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.1%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
83.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs White/Caucasian Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 453,770,052 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.076 and weighted average of 9.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 580,507,167 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.899 and weighted average of 11.1%, a difference of 20.0%.
Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bhutanese | White/Caucasian |
Minimum | 1.0% | 7.3% |
Maximum | 32.4% | 36.7% |
Range | 31.4% | 29.4% |
Mean | 10.2% | 15.6% |
Median | 8.8% | 14.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 10.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.0% | 19.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.0% | 9.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.3% | 6.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.3% | 6.5% |
Similar Demographics by Receiving Food Stamps
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Czech (9.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Swedish (9.2%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.2%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Ireland (9.2%, a difference of 0.43%), and Immigrants from Northern Europe (9.2%, a difference of 0.54%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.8 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Czechs | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bolivians | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Zimbabweans | 99.6 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Turks | 99.6 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Taiwanese (11.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (11.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Brazilian (11.1%, a difference of 0.18%), Soviet Union (11.1%, a difference of 0.21%), and Hungarian (11.0%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
Celtics | 87.8 /100 | #140 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.7 /100 | #141 | Excellent 11.0% |
Chileans | 86.2 /100 | #142 | Excellent 11.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 86.0 /100 | #143 | Excellent 11.0% |
Syrians | 85.5 /100 | #144 | Excellent 11.0% |
Hungarians | 85.1 /100 | #145 | Excellent 11.0% |
Taiwanese | 84.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 11.0% |
Whites/Caucasians | 83.9 /100 | #147 | Excellent 11.1% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.3 /100 | #148 | Excellent 11.1% |
Brazilians | 83.2 /100 | #149 | Excellent 11.1% |
Soviet Union | 83.1 /100 | #150 | Excellent 11.1% |
Immigrants | Spain | 81.7 /100 | #151 | Excellent 11.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 81.7 /100 | #152 | Excellent 11.1% |
Lebanese | 81.6 /100 | #153 | Excellent 11.1% |
Armenians | 81.4 /100 | #154 | Excellent 11.1% |