Bhutanese vs Iranian Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Iranian
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Bhutanese
Iranians
11.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
16th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.4%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
30th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Iranian Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 397,447,211 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.032 and weighted average of 11.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 284,868,463 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Iranians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.134 and weighted average of 11.4%, a difference of 3.0%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bhutanese | Iranian |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 3.2% |
| Maximum | 57.1% | 49.0% |
| Range | 55.5% | 45.8% |
| Mean | 13.5% | 12.4% |
| Median | 11.1% | 10.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.1% | 6.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.5% | 14.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.4% | 8.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.2% | 8.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.2% | 8.8% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese and Iranians by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Tsimshian (11.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Bolivia (11.1%, a difference of 0.42%), Korean (11.0%, a difference of 0.75%), Chinese (11.0%, a difference of 0.81%), and Immigrants from Moldova (11.2%, a difference of 0.81%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Iranians are Immigrants from Egypt (11.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Iran (11.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Asia (11.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (11.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from China (11.4%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 11.4% |