Bhutanese vs Immigrants from China Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Immigrants from China
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Bhutanese
Immigrants from China
11.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
16th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.4%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
27th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Immigrants from China Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 397,447,211 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.032 and weighted average of 11.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 395,740,575 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.223 and weighted average of 11.4%, a difference of 2.8%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bhutanese | Immigrants from China |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 1.7% |
| Maximum | 57.1% | 20.6% |
| Range | 55.5% | 18.8% |
| Mean | 13.5% | 10.6% |
| Median | 11.1% | 10.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.1% | 8.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.5% | 12.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.4% | 4.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.2% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.2% | 3.4% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese and Immigrants from China by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Tsimshian (11.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Bolivia (11.1%, a difference of 0.42%), Korean (11.0%, a difference of 0.75%), Chinese (11.0%, a difference of 0.81%), and Immigrants from Moldova (11.2%, a difference of 0.81%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Asia (11.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Egypt (11.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Iranian (11.4%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Iran (11.4%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from Japan (11.3%, a difference of 0.71%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.4% |