Immigrants from Panama vs Immigrants from China Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Panama
Immigrants from China
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Panama
Immigrants from China
12.6%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
72.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.4%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
27th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Panama vs Immigrants from China Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 206,693,503 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Panama and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.791 and weighted average of 12.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 395,740,575 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.223 and weighted average of 11.4%, a difference of 11.1%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Panama | Immigrants from China |
Minimum | 3.3% | 1.7% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 20.6% |
Range | 96.7% | 18.8% |
Mean | 21.6% | 10.6% |
Median | 13.3% | 10.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.7% | 8.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.6% | 12.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 4.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.6% | 3.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.8% | 3.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Panama by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Panama are Immigrants from Hungary (12.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Australian (12.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Sierra Leonean (12.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Yugoslavian (12.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants (12.7%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Immigrants | France | 75.8 /100 | #143 | Good 12.6% |
Hawaiians | 75.1 /100 | #144 | Good 12.6% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 75.0 /100 | #145 | Good 12.6% |
Native Hawaiians | 75.0 /100 | #146 | Good 12.6% |
Malaysians | 74.8 /100 | #147 | Good 12.6% |
Yugoslavians | 73.9 /100 | #148 | Good 12.6% |
Sierra Leoneans | 73.0 /100 | #149 | Good 12.6% |
Immigrants | Panama | 72.1 /100 | #150 | Good 12.6% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 71.9 /100 | #151 | Good 12.6% |
Australians | 71.4 /100 | #152 | Good 12.6% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 70.1 /100 | #153 | Good 12.7% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 68.9 /100 | #154 | Good 12.7% |
Immigrants | Spain | 68.7 /100 | #155 | Good 12.7% |
Vietnamese | 67.9 /100 | #156 | Good 12.7% |
Latvians | 67.9 /100 | #157 | Good 12.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Asia (11.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Egypt (11.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Iranian (11.4%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Iran (11.4%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (11.4%, a difference of 0.40%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 11.4% |