Basque vs Immigrants from Jordan Male Poverty
COMPARE
Basque
Immigrants from Jordan
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Basques
Immigrants from Jordan
10.9%
MALE POVERTY
74.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
MALE POVERTY
77.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Basque vs Immigrants from Jordan Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,709,169 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Basques and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.751 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,249,904 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.284 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 0.40%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Basque | Immigrants from Jordan |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 60.5% | 30.3% |
| Range | 59.0% | 28.5% |
| Mean | 13.3% | 11.0% |
| Median | 10.9% | 9.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.7% | 7.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.3% | 12.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.6% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.5% | 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Basques and Immigrants from Jordan by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Basques are Immigrants from France (10.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Tlingit-Haida (10.9%, a difference of 0.20%), Afghan (10.9%, a difference of 0.34%), Samoan (10.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Germany (10.9%, a difference of 0.38%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Yugoslavian (10.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Tlingit-Haida (10.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from France (10.9%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Switzerland (10.8%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Israel (10.8%, a difference of 0.53%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Chileans | 83.9 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 83.3 /100 | #131 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 83.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #133 | Excellent 10.8% |
| New Zealanders | 82.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Brazilians | 82.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 80.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 79.2 /100 | #137 | Good 10.8% |
| Yugoslavians | 78.2 /100 | #138 | Good 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 77.5 /100 | #139 | Good 10.8% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 76.1 /100 | #140 | Good 10.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 75.8 /100 | #141 | Good 10.9% |
| Basques | 74.6 /100 | #142 | Good 10.9% |
| Afghans | 71.9 /100 | #143 | Good 10.9% |
| Samoans | 71.8 /100 | #144 | Good 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 71.6 /100 | #145 | Good 10.9% |
| Syrians | 71.4 /100 | #146 | Good 10.9% |
| Icelanders | 68.5 /100 | #147 | Good 11.0% |
| Armenians | 68.0 /100 | #148 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 67.9 /100 | #149 | Good 11.0% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 67.6 /100 | #150 | Good 11.0% |