Immigrants from Hungary vs Immigrants from Jordan Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Hungary
Immigrants from Jordan
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Hungary
Immigrants from Jordan
10.7%
MALE POVERTY
87.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
119th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
MALE POVERTY
77.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Hungary vs Immigrants from Jordan Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,630,615 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hungary and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.417 and weighted average of 10.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,249,904 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.284 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 1.8%.

Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Hungary | Immigrants from Jordan |
Minimum | 1.8% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 37.5% | 30.3% |
Range | 35.8% | 28.5% |
Mean | 9.2% | 11.0% |
Median | 7.6% | 9.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.6% | 7.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.9% | 12.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.3% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.1% | 5.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.0% | 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hungary and Immigrants from Jordan by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hungary are Immigrants from China (10.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Peruvian (10.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Native Hawaiian (10.7%, a difference of 0.13%), South African (10.7%, a difference of 0.17%), and French (10.7%, a difference of 0.20%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Yugoslavian (10.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Switzerland (10.8%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Israel (10.8%, a difference of 0.53%), Brazilian (10.8%, a difference of 0.84%), and New Zealander (10.8%, a difference of 0.88%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Hungary | 87.6 /100 | #119 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | China | 87.1 /100 | #120 | Excellent 10.7% |
Peruvians | 87.1 /100 | #121 | Excellent 10.7% |
Native Hawaiians | 87.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 10.7% |
South Africans | 86.8 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.7% |
French | 86.7 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Norway | 86.0 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 84.3 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.7% |
Puget Sound Salish | 84.3 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 84.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Peru | 84.1 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.7% |
Chileans | 83.9 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 83.3 /100 | #131 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 83.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 10.8% |
Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #133 | Excellent 10.8% |
New Zealanders | 82.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 10.8% |
Brazilians | 82.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 10.8% |
Immigrants | Israel | 80.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 10.8% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 79.2 /100 | #137 | Good 10.8% |
Yugoslavians | 78.2 /100 | #138 | Good 10.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 77.5 /100 | #139 | Good 10.8% |