Bulgarian vs Chinese Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
COMPARE
Bulgarian
Chinese
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Comparison
Bulgarians
Chinese
13.9%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 5
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
23rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 5
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
7th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bulgarian vs Chinese Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 199,600,281 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Bulgarians and poverty level among children under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.485 and weighted average of 13.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,186,861 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among children under the age of 5 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.065 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 6.4%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bulgarian | Chinese |
Minimum | 0.17% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 53.8% |
Range | 99.8% | 52.0% |
Mean | 18.5% | 14.4% |
Median | 13.4% | 12.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.7% | 6.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.8% | 18.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.1% | 12.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.4% | 10.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.3% | 10.7% |
Demographics Similar to Bulgarians and Chinese by Child Poverty Under the Age of 5
In terms of child poverty under the age of 5, the demographic groups most similar to Bulgarians are Immigrants from Bolivia (13.8%, a difference of 0.44%), Asian (14.0%, a difference of 0.51%), Bolivian (13.8%, a difference of 0.52%), Cypriot (14.0%, a difference of 0.52%), and Immigrants from Japan (13.8%, a difference of 0.82%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Iranian (13.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Iran (13.1%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Singapore (12.9%, a difference of 0.98%), Burmese (13.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Korea (13.2%, a difference of 1.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 5 |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.9% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Asians | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 14.0% |